We have already touched on some of the processes and issues involved in the disposal of oil and gas waste on the page dedicated to radioactivity. Here, let's take a deeper dive into the specific disposal methods used across the industry and explore the technical process and concerns for each one. The disposal of fracking waste can be broken down into three categories: solid waste, liquid waste, and radioactive waste sent to specific radioactive disposal sites.

​

Solid Waste Disposal

As fracking operations proceed, large volumes of solid waste are generated. This includes drill cuttings, which are fragments of rock removed during drilling, along with sludge—a dense mixture of sand, chemicals, and radioactive materials that settle out during the production process. Once the oil or gas has been extracted, this solid waste is gathered and either sent for downblending or disposed of in landfills.

In the downblending process, the solid waste is mixed with inert materials such as dirt, lime, or even fly ash from coal plants. The goal isn’t to neutralize the hazardous substances, but to dilute them to acceptable levels of radioactivity or toxicity, allowing the waste to slip through regulatory loopholes at landfills. The diluted waste is then hauled to municipal landfills, many of which aren’t designed to handle radioactive or hazardous materials. Although the waste is buried deep within the landfills, the radioactive components linger for centuries, slowly accumulating over time.

Key Concerns:

• Downblending: As mentioned previously, this method dilutes but doesn’t reduce the total volume of radioactive material. The waste is simply "watered down" enough to pass landfill detection systems, meaning the risks are spread out but not eliminated.

• Landfills: Many of these landfills are municipal and not designed to handle hazardous or radioactive materials, leading to potential contamination of soil and groundwater.

• Long-Term Storage: Solid fracking waste, once buried, will remain in the environment for centuries, potentially leaching harmful materials into surrounding ecosystems.

​

Liquid Waste Disposal

Liquid waste, often referred to as produced water or flowback, is the toxic mix of water, chemicals, and naturally occurring elements like heavy metals that flow back up after the fracking process. Once separated from the extracted oil or gas, this wastewater is often stored temporarily in holding tanks or open-air pits at the well site. These pits can sometimes be as vast as football fields, designed to hold the large volumes of wastewater that must be managed.

The bulk of this liquid waste is then injected deep underground into Class II injection wells. These wells, often repurposed from older oil or gas extraction sites, are used to store the wastewater permanently by injecting it into porous rock formations at high pressure. While the concept sounds straightforward—putting the waste back underground where it came from—the reality is more complex and fraught with risks. The underground formations can shift, and there’s always the chance that the wastewater will migrate into nearby aquifers or even resurface through other wells, causing widespread contamination.

​

Key Concerns:

• Injection Wells: While injection wells are intended to hold the wastewater safely, the fluid can migrate, seeping into aquifers or reemerging at other well sites.

• Induced Seismicity: This process has been linked to an increase in earthquake activity, particularly in regions like Oklahoma and Texas, where high volumes of wastewater are injected.

• Surface Impoundments: Open-air pits used to store wastewater before disposal pose risks of spills, leaks, and evaporation that can lead to airborne toxins contaminating nearby communities.

​

Radioactive Waste Disposal (Dedicated Sites)

For fracking waste that is too radioactive to be handled by downblending or standard landfills, the industry turns to a more formal disposal method: transporting the waste to specialized radioactive disposal sites. These sites, located in states like Utah and Nevada, are designed specifically for handling highly radioactive materials. Waste is loaded onto trucks or trains, sometimes traveling hundreds or even thousands of miles across the country to reach these facilities.

At these disposal sites, the waste is buried in deep underground repositories, with the idea being that the radioactivity will be contained far below the surface, isolated from people and ecosystems. However, even this method is not without its challenges. Reports of leaks during transport and concerns over potential train derailments carrying radioactive material pose significant dangers.

​

Key Concerns:

• Transport: Moving radioactive waste across the country presents significant risks. There have been cases where trains carrying this waste were found leaking radioactive material. Additionally, the fear of a train derailment raises serious concerns about the potential contamination of wide areas.

• Long-Term Containment: Even in specialized sites, the long-term storage of large amounts of radioactive material raises questions about the permanence of containment and the potential for leaks or environmental contamination in the future.

• Monitoring: These sites need to be monitored for centuries, which presents a cost and logistical challenge for future generations.

​